I'm in the middle of writing a break-up scene for a teen / young adult novel. The stakes for the characters are very high - both in life and love - and there's a great deal of anger and tension on both sides of the conflict.
I've paused to write a blog post because I caught myself about to write a paragraph which would, in effect, have the heroine assaulting the hero. In my mind it was her frustration and hurt being communicated in a way that she knew wouldn't actually hurt him, but would vent some of her anger. He's a big boy, he can take it. I was fine with it - until I remembered a conversation we had on the blog a couple of months ago.
In this post on what I dubbed "The Stephenie Meyer Effect", while discussing some of the technical writing issues, the ethical aspects of the love-story in the Twilight Saga were raised. While I didn't agree with all of the comments, they gave me significant food for thought. Now, in my own writing, I find the issues front and centre.
Some readers of the Twilight Saga see a passionate, fantastical love story between a human girl and a vampire man. Others see an obssessive, unhealthy and at times illegal fixation of a mature man on a young girl.
Depending on the reader's interpretation, the actions taken by the 'hero' in Twilight (Edward - the 100 year old Vampire who looks like a seventeen-year-old boy) could be read as unerringly protective and chivalrous, or frighteningly controlling and power-hungry.
Some people find the character's behaviour abhorrent and a terribly dangerous example for young people, others see chivalry and romantic sacrifice.
Who is right? Both? Neither? And what, if anything, should an author do about it?
At what point do we, as writers, become responsible for how our stories affect or shape the minds of our audience? I am guessing that writers of adult fiction would be mostly free of stricture, as the audience would be considered to be in a position to determine for themselves not only what they will read, but also have enough life experience behind them to choose what they take away from a story.
But young minds? Can we really believe we aren't at least a small part of forming desires, expectations, even boundaries for young readers?
Is it irresponsible for me to depict a heroine physically expressing her hurt and anger when a young reader might romanticize the scene and later emulate it? Am I responsible if a young woman took similar action - perhaps in the company of a young man without the moral fortitude and physical restraint of my hero?
My writerly heart is heavy. I am a mother myself. I write for teens. I have no desire to be a negative influence on anyone - quite the opposite. Neither do I want to pretend that human relationships and conflicts aren't fraught with danger for both sides.
Where should I draw the line?
What do you think? My authorial ears are wide open.
I've paused to write a blog post because I caught myself about to write a paragraph which would, in effect, have the heroine assaulting the hero. In my mind it was her frustration and hurt being communicated in a way that she knew wouldn't actually hurt him, but would vent some of her anger. He's a big boy, he can take it. I was fine with it - until I remembered a conversation we had on the blog a couple of months ago.
In this post on what I dubbed "The Stephenie Meyer Effect", while discussing some of the technical writing issues, the ethical aspects of the love-story in the Twilight Saga were raised. While I didn't agree with all of the comments, they gave me significant food for thought. Now, in my own writing, I find the issues front and centre.
Some readers of the Twilight Saga see a passionate, fantastical love story between a human girl and a vampire man. Others see an obssessive, unhealthy and at times illegal fixation of a mature man on a young girl.
Depending on the reader's interpretation, the actions taken by the 'hero' in Twilight (Edward - the 100 year old Vampire who looks like a seventeen-year-old boy) could be read as unerringly protective and chivalrous, or frighteningly controlling and power-hungry.
Some people find the character's behaviour abhorrent and a terribly dangerous example for young people, others see chivalry and romantic sacrifice.
Who is right? Both? Neither? And what, if anything, should an author do about it?
At what point do we, as writers, become responsible for how our stories affect or shape the minds of our audience? I am guessing that writers of adult fiction would be mostly free of stricture, as the audience would be considered to be in a position to determine for themselves not only what they will read, but also have enough life experience behind them to choose what they take away from a story.
But young minds? Can we really believe we aren't at least a small part of forming desires, expectations, even boundaries for young readers?
Is it irresponsible for me to depict a heroine physically expressing her hurt and anger when a young reader might romanticize the scene and later emulate it? Am I responsible if a young woman took similar action - perhaps in the company of a young man without the moral fortitude and physical restraint of my hero?
My writerly heart is heavy. I am a mother myself. I write for teens. I have no desire to be a negative influence on anyone - quite the opposite. Neither do I want to pretend that human relationships and conflicts aren't fraught with danger for both sides.
Where should I draw the line?
What do you think? My authorial ears are wide open.