When I read a query, or query blurb of a story, I'm looking for five major elements communicated crisply, quickly, and clearly:
Who is the book about, where are they (and when, if applicable)? What does the protagonist want? What's the conflict, and who or what is the antagonistic force? What's at stake--and for your final hook, what specific obstacle will potentially stop the protagonist from achieving their goal?
If a query can outline that in under 250 words, it's a winner. So let's take a look at this first query and see how it stacks up:
A
millennium ago, the Pantheon used to consist of five states, before one of
them, the Meridian Island, sank underground mysteriously overnight. Everyone
blames its last ruler, the nefarious Prime Princess – after all, she did commit
parricide. Little do they know, the princess was avenging her husband’s brutal
murder. Everyone suspects she was associated with the Void (an entity who seeks
the five elements to destroy humanity). Little do they know how much she
sacrificed to protect humanity from the Void. With her kingdom, her true
story's lost, and her fate unknown.
A
millennium later,
Who is the book about, where are they (and when, if applicable)? What does the protagonist want? What's the conflict, and who or what is the antagonistic force? What's at stake--and for your final hook, what specific obstacle will potentially stop the protagonist from achieving their goal?
If a query can outline that in under 250 words, it's a winner. So let's take a look at this first query and see how it stacks up:
QUERY CONTENT:
A
millennium ago, the Pantheon used to consist of five states, before one of
them, the Meridian Island, sank underground mysteriously overnight. Everyone
blames its last ruler, the nefarious Prime Princess – after all, she did commit
parricide. Little do they know, the princess was avenging her husband’s brutal
murder. Everyone suspects she was associated with the Void (an entity who seeks
the five elements to destroy humanity). Little do they know how much she
sacrificed to protect humanity from the Void. With her kingdom, her true
story's lost, and her fate unknown.
A
millennium later, history is about to be repeated with Quince Shakran, a day
laborer, who is blamed for his brother’s impending death. Only the High Priest
of the Autumn Plateau can heal his brother, but the priest only obeys the
Plateau’s king. To win the king’s favor, Quince accepts the scholarship to the
Plateau he was offered instead of his brother. However, his relationship with
an enigmatic royal prisoner jeopardizes his goals, and thrusts him into the
hibernated battle against the Void the Prime Princess had incited a millennium
ago. With the existence of humanity at stake, Quince must join the battle
alongside the royal prisoner over the guardianship of the elements.
Inspired
by Bronze Age civilizations, [TITLE] is a YA fantasy complete at 120,000 words.
Written in dual POVs from Quince and the Prime Princess, it'll appeal to fans
of AN EMBER IN THE ASHES and AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER."
CRITIQUE (my notes in red font)
Please note, there’s
a lot of critical analysis of this query, however the criticism is of the
structure of the wording, not the story itself. I believe the right elements
are here for a strong fantasy book. However, this query doesn’t answer the
right questions or give information clearly, so it won’t do the story justice
in a query:
This is all backstory, and isn’t needed for a query, at least, not
up front.
Quince
Shakran, a day laborer (in whichever state of the
Pantheon—just give the name and Pantheon at this point, that cues the reader
this is a fantasy world), who is blamed for his brother’s
impending death.
This is your hook. This is where you start. And you pull the reader
in by, in the next couple sentences, telling them who blames Quince, and what he’s
is accused of doing to cause his brother’s “impending” death (because that’s makes
the entire situation a little less fraught—after all, the brother might not die?)
Only the
High Priest of the Autumn Plateau, who answers to the
Plateau’s King, can heal his brother, but the priest only obeys the
Plateau’s king. To win the king’s favor, [and earn
the right to ask for his brother’s healing—or something along those lines] Quince
accepts the scholarship to the Plateau he was offered instead of his brother.
This last part is confusing and needs to be rephrased as a challenge
in some way. If he’s being blamed for his brother’s impending death, why would
they give him a scholarship, which is a positive thing? It would hook the
reader more to hear that Quince will be forced to fill the gap left by his
brother, but it puts him at risk in some way. So his goal is to save his
brother, but the conflict is . . . what? We still don’t actually know. We need
to know what’s at stake, and what the obstacle is (clearly)
However,
his relationship with an enigmatic royal prisoner jeopardizes his goals,
How did he become friends with a prisoner if he’s in a scholarship
and earning the King’s favor?
Needs to be phrased more along the lines of, “In his role as X, he
is forced into close quarters with the royal prisoner, [NAME THE CHARACTER AND MAKE
IT CLEAR WHETHER THE RELATIONSHIP IS ROMANTIC OR PLUTONIC ]. As their
relationship develops, the [WHATEVER ELEMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP IS A PROBLEM] will
force Quince to [EXPLAIN WHAT THE CONFLICT IS, AND WHAT’S AT STAKE].
and thrusts
him into the hibernated battle against the Void the Prime Princess had incited
a millennium ago. With the existence of humanity at stake, Quince must join the
battle alongside the royal prisoner over the guardianship of the elements.
This is all great fantasy phrasing, but is confusing in its
structure and doesn’t actually tell the reader what we need to know: What could
happen to Quince (presumably he could die), why should a reader care
(presumably because the entire earth could be harmed in some way) and how Quince will be forced into war. We
have no idea what the guardianship of the elements is/are and why are we
calling a character “the royal prisoner” instead of their name? The prisoner is
what they are, not who they are.
Inspired
by Bronze Age civilizations, [TITLE] is a YA fantasy complete at 120,000 words.
Written in dual POVs from Quince and the Prime Princess, it'll appeal to fans
of AN EMBER IN THE ASHES and AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER."
This is a great summary and would definitely grab an agent’s
interest if the blurb of the story was much clearer.
I know I’ve really torn that query apart. I don’t want the author to
be discouraged. Summarizing and hooking a reader with a blurb is a completely
different skillset to writing a book. Many authors aren’t good at it (I’m one
of them), so we get help from others to make sure our queries have the right
information, in the right order:
- Who’s your protagonist and where are they (time and place, though in a fantasy it’s really just place).
- The villain, antagonistic force, or obstacle they’re facing.
- What’s the protag’s goal.
- What’s at stake (what does the protag have to lose).
- And finally, a hint at something dire that’s about to happen that will make us fear for the protagonist. Not a question, but a statement “If protag doesn’t do X, in Y time, they face Z...)
I’m sure this critique would be hard to read, and I feel for the
author (my early critiques were similarly muddied). However, I’ll say again,
that I believe all the elements for a very strong fantasy world, and intriguing
book are here. This query just doesn’t give enough clarity and stakes to make
an agent jump on it.
I’m sorry to say, I think you need a complete rewrite. The good news
is, with the right query (and tightly polished material), I think you’ll have
agents jumping to request pages.
Take another stab at it and have it read by people who know nothing
about your book. When they’ve read it, as them what they think it’s about, and
what might happen. It’s the best way to gauge if your query is serving your
story well. If someone who’s never read any of the book can describe the main
characters and conflict, and what’s at stake, then you’ve done your job!
Don’t be discouraged. Keep going!
This is the best explanation I have seen that explains how a query should be written. Thank you, I think I know how to revise mine now.
ReplyDeleteGlad to help!
Delete